Skip to content

OM in the News: The End of Just-in-Time?

March 25, 2020

After a brief recession in the early 1990s, the grocery industry came under pressure to improve profit margins. Companies settled on just in time that aimed to produce, ship and stock as few goods as possible to meet demand. By decreasing the capacity of their distribution centers, retailers saved on rent, utilities and labor. Distributors saved on fuel and wages. Manufacturers cut down on unsold inventory. In the past 2 decades, producers and grocery stores such as Kroger have gone from keeping months of inventory on hand to holding only a few weeks’ supply.

Other industries did the same, from auto making to health care. This finely balanced system works well while goods are flowing steadily. But the coronovirus black swan event blew it to pieces. For many items, supplies sold out in days, exposing the downside of the push to hold less stock in warehouses and operate fewer, fuller trucks.

Now abruptly, manufacturers, distributors and retailers have thrown that strategy into reverse, writes The Wall Street Journal (March 24, 2020). They are making as much food as they can, delivering it as fast as possible and adding staff, all to restock denuded shelves.

General Mills is trying to skip steps in a carefully calibrated process. It is delivering truckloads of Cheerios, flour and pasta straight to stores’ warehouses, instead of first sending products to its own warehouses, to eliminate a link in the supply chain. Retailers, meanwhile, are overriding the sophisticated algorithms that say how much of what products they should buy, after seeing how those models failed to account for the demand surge. Instead, retailers are talking directly to manufacturers and making decisions in real time. “JIT purchasing has been thrown out the window,” said one CEO.

Yet manufacturers run the risk of throttling up production too high if the crush in demand for some products proves to be temporary.

Classroom discussion questions;

  1. Relate this article to the discussion of supplier partnerships in Ch. 16 of your Heizer/Render/Munson OM text.
  2. How does this “black swan” event impact the bullwhip effect discussed in Supplement 11?
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: