Skip to content

OM in the News: Ford’s Epic Gamble on Aluminum

August 16, 2014
Alcoa's Iowa plant has expanded to meet the growing need for aluminum in the auto industry

Alcoa’s Iowa plant has expanded to meet the growing need for aluminum in the auto industry

Ford has a long-term plan to unify its global manufacturing, writes Fortune (July 24, 2014). But profits depend largely on a beefy truck that is sold only in N. America and will never find a market in Asia or Europe. Not that it needs to. The F-series has outsold every other car and truck in the U.S. for 3 decades, with some 33 million out the door. So when Ford decided in 2009 to fundamentally change the product it advertises as “Built Ford tough” by making it with a lightweight aluminum body, it was messing with a uniquely valuable franchise. Ford figured the change could reduce the weight of the F-series by 700 pounds, significantly improving its fuel economy (US standards require a fleetwide average of 54.5 mpg by 2025).

But aluminum is more expensive than steel, more complicated to assemble, and more difficult to repair. The changeover from steel would mean alterations to nearly every phase of the business. Aluminum can’t be easily welded and must be riveted and bonded with adhesives. New suppliers would have to be found and validated, plants refitted, production techniques changed, repair technicians hired and trained. Importantly, the changeover to the 2015 models would have to be extended, slowing production and denting profits. “It will be magic or tragic,” says the CEO of AutoNation.

Adds Ford’s CEO, “We had three alternatives: make incremental changes to the existing truck, add more aluminum parts, or make it all aluminum.” Ford created 4 work teams to investigate what it saw as the big unknowns surrounding aluminum: availability, manufacturability, serviceability, and likability. At the Dearborn Truck Plant, one of 2 plants where the F-150 will be built, the company is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to build and install new stamping presses and dies to produce the aluminum panels and replace today’s spot welders with rivet guns, advanced welders, and adhesive machinery in the body shop. With both plants currently producing the 2014 F-150, they will have to be taken down one at a time for a total of 13 weeks for refitting, depriving Ford of $2 billion in revenue.

Classroom discussion questions:

1. How is Ford’s production process changing?

2. What are the risks the company faces?

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Supply Chain Management Research

Andreas Wieland’s supply chain management blog for academics and managers

better operations

Thoughts on continuous improvement: from TPS to XPS

%d bloggers like this: